This paper considers the common problem of testing the equality of means in
a repeated measures design. Recent results indicate that practical problem
s can arise when computing confidence intervals for all pairwise difference
s of the means in conjunction with the Bonferroni inequality. This suggests
, and is confirmed here, that a problem might occur when performing an omni
bus test of equal means. The problem is that the probability of rejecting i
s not minimized when the means are equal and the usual univariate F test is
used with the Huynh-Feldt correction (<(epsilon)over tilde>) for the degre
es of freedom. That is, power can actually decrease as the mean of one grou
p is lowered, although eventually it increases. A similar problem is found
when using a multivariate method (Hotelling's T-2). Moreover, the probabili
ty of a Type I error can exceed the nominal level by a large amount. The pa
per considers methods for correcting this problem, and new results on compa
ring trimmed means are reported as well. In terms of both Type I errors and
power, simulations reported here suggest that a percentile t bootstrap use
d with 20% trimmed means and an analogue of the <(epsilon)over tilde>-adjus
ted F gives the best results. This is consistent with extant theoretical re
sults comparing methods based on means with trimmed means.