The golden section is a well-known proportion that occurs when something (e
.g. a line! is divided into two unequal parts such that the smaller (m) is
to the larger (M) as the larger is to the sum of the two (i.e. m/M = M/(M+m
) = .618). Dalzell's theorem holds that the absolute value of the differenc
e between M/(M + m) and .618 will tend to be smaller than the corresponding
difference between m/M and .618. This means that the use of M/(M+m) ratios
leads to results that are more supportive of the golden section hypothesis
than does the use of m/M ratios. Notice that M/(M+m) corresponds to the pr
oportion of ns that will occur; while m/M corresponds to the odds that m wi
ll occur. While these are mathematically equivalent, in practice they may l
ead to different interpretations of the same data. Although originally envi
saged as applying to the golden section, Dalzell's theorem map have implica
tions for any study that uses either a proportion or the odds as a dependen
t measure. The use of proportions may produce results that are closer to a
predicted value than will the use of the odds as a dependent measure.