Alternatives to the fire assay procedure for the preparation of automobilecatalyst samples prior to analysis

Citation
F. Smith et al., Alternatives to the fire assay procedure for the preparation of automobilecatalyst samples prior to analysis, CAN J A S S, 44(5), 1999, pp. 148-153
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL SCIENCES AND SPECTROSCOPY
ISSN journal
12056685 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
148 - 153
Database
ISI
SICI code
1205-6685(1999)44:5<148:ATTFAP>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
To ensure reliable results for precious metal (PM) determinations, where th e metals are unevenly distributed through the matrix, adaptations of the fi re-assay procedure are normally used for sample preparation. Fire assay for precious metals usually refers to a process in, which the assay portion of a sample (usually from 10 - 30 g) is heated with a flux containing either litharge or nickel sulphide. The complete process is complex, very time-con suming and labour intensive, and so alternative methods of sample preparati on have been sought for many years (I). An open-beaker digestion method (I) , a microwave-assisted pressure digestion method (II) and a sodium peroxide fusion method (III) are described for the dissolution of automobile exhaus t catalyst samples prior to their analyses for platinum, palladium and rhod ium by ICP-MS. Sample sizes varied between 0.1 and 0.25 g. Analyses were pe rformed on a Perkin-Elmer Elan 6000 ICP-MS with indium and iridium as inter nal standards. With Methods I and II, good recoveries (similar to 100%) wer e achieved for platinum and palladium, but the rhodium recoveries (similar to 90%) were unsatisfactory. However, with Method III, excellent recoveries (similar to 100%) were found for all three elements and its introduction l ed to a reduction in cost (labour and materials) from $350 to $35 per sampl e.