Surgical treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients

Authors
Citation
E. Wyllie, Surgical treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients, CAN J NEUR, 27(2), 2000, pp. 106-110
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
03171671 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
106 - 110
Database
ISI
SICI code
0317-1671(200005)27:2<106:STOEIP>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Surgery has become an accepted treatment modality for carefully selected ad ults with intractable focal epilepsy. More recently, increasing numbers of pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy are also being referred for su rgical consideration. Key elements of Surgical candidacy include medically intractable focal epilepsy, a localized epileptogenic zone, and a low risk for new postoperative neurologic deficits. The most common etiologies of th e epilepsies in pediatric surgical candidates are malformation of cortical development and low grade tumor but some patients with childhood onset temp oral lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis also present for early surg ery. Based on results from several recent pediatric surgical series, the ch ance for favorable seizure outcome after surgery is not adversely affected by youngs age, with seizure-free postoperative outcome reported for 60% to 65% of infants, 59% to 67% of children, and 69% of adolescents, compared to 64% reported in a large, predominantly adult series. Some subgroups of pat ients have higher percentages of seizure-free outcome, including those with hippocampal sclerosis or low grade tumor. In addition to seizures, develop mental issues are also a major concern in children with intractable epileps y. Few quantitative data are available, but some anecdotal experience sugge sts that surgical relief of catastrophic epilepsy may result in resumption of developmental progression after surgery, although the rate of developmen t often remains abnormal. In one series, best developmental outcomes were s een in patients with earliest surgery and highest level of preoperative dev elopment. For each patient, the timing of surgery must be carefully conside red, based on a full assessment of the relative risks and benefits, derived from a detailed presurgical evaluation.