S. Chaturvedi et al., Attitudes of Canadian and US neurologists regarding carotid endarterectomyfor asymptomatic stenosis, CAN J NEUR, 27(2), 2000, pp. 116-119
Background: The American Heart Association carotid endarterectomy (CE) guid
elines endorse CE for asymptomatic carotid stenosis if the procedure can be
performed with low morbidity. However, the Canadian Stroke Consortium has
published a consensus against CE for asymptomatic stenosis. The views of pr
acticing: neurologists in the two countries on this subject are unclear. Me
thods: A survey was undertaken of 270 neurologists from either Florida or I
ndiana and 180 neurologists from either Ontario or Quebec. Results: The sur
vey was returned by 36% of neurologists. Both Florida (65%) and Indiana neu
rologists (35%) were significantly more likely than Canadian neurologists (
11%) to sometimes/often refer patients for surgery (p<0,001), Neurologists
from Florida relied more on noninvasive methods of carotid stenosis assessm
ent (36%) than Canadian neurologists (12%, p=0.003), who preferred angiogra
phy. Neurologists from Florida more often cited medicolegal concerns as a r
eason for referring patients for surgery (27%), compared to Canadian neurol
ogists (3%, p=0.0001). Conclusions: Practices pertaining to carotid stenosi
s evaluation and management differ both regionally and by country. Canadian
neurologists refer fewer asymptomatic patients for CE and rely more on ang
iography as a preoperative diagnostic tool. The potential of medicolegal li
ability is a greater force in clinical decision-making for certain U.S neur
ologists, compared to their Canadian counterparts. These differences may pa
rtly explain the variations in CE utilization in the two countries.