This article addresses social policy decision making during the initial man
dates of United States President Bill Clinton and Canada's Prime Minister J
ean Chretien with reference to three streams of comparative argumentation:
power resources explanations that stress the role of partisan and trade uni
on interests; retrenchment propositions that emphasize electoral, budgetary
and institutional influences; and feminist critiques that underline patter
ns of inequality in welfare state development. The study concludes that par
allel trajectories in both countries after 1993, including considerable cha
nges in social assistance policy, offer support for a revised retrenchment
thesis which would take account of significant gender, class and minority d
imensions of welfare state contraction.