Surgical approach to complicated cervical aortic arch: anatomic, developmental, and surgical considerations

Citation
Db. Mcelhinney et al., Surgical approach to complicated cervical aortic arch: anatomic, developmental, and surgical considerations, CARD YOUNG, 10(3), 2000, pp. 212-219
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG
ISSN journal
10479511 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
212 - 219
Database
ISI
SICI code
1047-9511(200005)10:3<212:SATCCA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Background Abnormalities of brachiocephalic arterial branching and arch lat erality are common in patients with a cervical aortic arch. In addition, st ructural anomalies of the arch such as obstruction, aneurysms, and tortuosi ty are found in a significant number of cases. Methods. Between 1990 and 19 98, 6 patients underwent surgery for an obstructed right cervical arch. A s ignificant obstruction was present at the transverse or distal arch in all patients, and was recurrent after previous repair in 2. In 1 patient, there was also a multi-lobed aneurysm of the aortic segment contiguous to the ob struction, and in 2 there was marked tortuosity of the arch. In all cases, the order of origin of the head and neck vessels was abnormal, and obstruct ion of 1 or more brachiocephalic vessels was found in 3. A vascular ring wa s present in all patients, with a right aortic arch and aberrant left subcl avian artery in 4 patients and a double aortic arch with a dominant right c ervical arch in 2. The descending aorta was circumflex (left-sided) in 3 pa tients. Three patients were repaired through a standard right posterolatera l thoracotomy, and 3 through a median sternotomy. Patch augmentation aortop lasty was used in 2 patients, a tube graft from the ascending to descending aorta in 2, end to side anastomosis of the descending aorta to the proxima l arch in I, and direct anastomosis to reconstruct an atretic left-sided co mponent of a double arch in 1. Results: Repair was successful in all cases, with no perioperative complications. At follow-up ranging from 1 to 9 year s, all patients were alive and well, with no recurrence of arch obstruction or other significant complications. Fluorescent in situ hybridization reve aled microdeletion of chromosome 22q11 in 1 patient (not performed in the o thers). Conclusions: Structural anomalies of the arch are relatively common in patients with a cervical aortic arch. Such abnormalities may be the res ult of hemodynamic conditions and/or abnormal vascular tissue related eithe r to the cervical position of the arch or its embryologic precursors. Given the highly variable anatomy of patients with a complicated cervical aortic arch, surgical considerations will vary in kind.