P. Raskin et al., Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes, DIABET CARE, 23(5), 2000, pp. 583-588
OBJECTIVE - To compare long-term glycemic control and safety of using insul
in aspart (IAsp) with that of regular human insulin (HI).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This was a multicenter randomized open-label
6-month study (882 subjects) with a 6-month extension period (714 subjects)
that enrolled subjects with type 1 diabetes. Subjects administered IAsp im
mediately before meals or regular HI 30 min before meals; basal NPH insulin
was taken as a single bedtime dose in the majority of subjects. Glycemic c
ontrol was assessed with HbA(1c) values and 8-point blood glucose profiles
at 3-month intervals.
RESULTS - Mean postprandial blood glucose levels (mg/dl +/- SEM) were signi
ficantly lower for subjects in the IAsp group compared with subjects in the
HI group after breakfast (156 +/- 3.4 vs. 185 +/- 4.7), lunch (137 +/- 3.1
vs. 162 +/- 4.1), and dinner (153 +/- 3.1vs. 168 +/- 4.1),when assessed aft
er 6 months of treatment. Mean HbA(1c) values (% +/- SEM) were slightly, bu
t significantly, lower for the IAsp group (7.78% +/- 0.03) than for the reg
ular HI group (7.93% +/- 0.05, P = 0.005) at 6 months. Similar postprandial
blood glucose and HbA(1c) values were observed at 12 months. Adverse event
s and overall hypoglycemic episodes were similar for both treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS - Postprandial glycemic control was significantly better with I
Asp compared with HI after 6 and 12 months of treatment. The improvement wa
s not obtained at an increased risk of hypoglycemia. HbA(1c) was slightly,
but significantly, lower for IAsp compared with HI at 6 and 12 months.