Under the Kyoto Protocol, the world's wealthier countries assumed binding c
ommitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement requires these
countries to consider ways to minimize adverse effects on developing count
ries of these actions, transmitted through trade. Using a general equilibri
um model of the world economy, we find that adverse effects fall mainly on
energy-exporting countries, for some even greater than on countries that ar
e assuming commitments. Removing existing fuel taxes and subsidies and usin
g international permit trading would greatly reduce the adverse impacts and
also reduce economic impacts on the countries taking on commitments. Anoth
er approach, preferential tariff reduction for developing countries, would
benefit many developing countries, but would not target those most adversel
y affected. If instead, OECD countries directly compensated developing coun
tries for losses, the required annual financial transfer would be on the or
der of $25 billion (1995 $US) in 2010. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r
ights reserved.