This paper reviews experience with two programs sponsored by the US Environ
mental Protection Agency - the Green Lights and Energy Star Office Products
programs - that promote the adoption of energy-efficient technologies thro
ugh voluntary agreements with private sector firms. The evidence suggests t
hat Green Lights has induced firms to make investments in cost-saving light
ing systems that firms failed to exploit prior to the program's implementat
ion. Energy Star Office Products, in contrast, has led suppliers of compute
rs and electronic equipment to substantially improve the energy efficiency
of their products in ways that confer net cost savings on equipment users.
The paper argues that the success of these programs is based on their abili
ty to reduce market failures related to problems of imperfect information a
nd bounded rationality that impair the effectiveness of both intra-firm org
anization and the coordination between equipment suppliers and their custom
ers. Given the nature of the technologies in question, these programs shoul
d have little effect on the demand for energy services so that energy effic
iency improvements should lead to one-to-one reductions in the level of ene
rgy use. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.