Comparison of different procedures to identify probable cases of myocardial infarction and stroke in two Swedish prospective cohort studies using local and national routine registers
J. Merlo et al., Comparison of different procedures to identify probable cases of myocardial infarction and stroke in two Swedish prospective cohort studies using local and national routine registers, EUR J EPID, 16(3), 2000, pp. 235-243
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
In prospective cohort studies, person-time time is calculated from baseline
until the first definite event occurs or until censoring. A way to correct
ly identify and date definite events when only routine registers are availa
ble is to retrieve all hospital discharge notes and death certificates with
a diagnosis of probable event and perform a consecutive revision. It is im
portant to detect all possible hospital stays as they may contain useful in
formation for the revision study. Furthermore, loss to follow-up can be avo
ided by extending the retrieval outside the specific geographical area wher
e the cohort was defined. The aims of this study were (i) to describe a com
prehensive retrieval of probable myocardial infarctions (diagnosis with Int
ernational Classification of Diseases 8th and 9th revisions codes 410-414)
or stroke (codes 430-438), (ii) to quantify the relative efficiency of diff
erent local and national routine registers or their combination compared wi
th the use of all available registers together, and (iii) to audit local an
d national registers by comparing their outcome at the county level. The st
udy was performed in two prospective cohorts studies i.e., 'Men-born-1914'
(n = 500) from Skane (period 1982-1993), and Skara-1 (n = 683) from Skarabo
rg (period 1988-1994.). All available routine registers were linked to the
cohorts. The use of all available routine registers improved retrieval of b
oth individual and hospital stays with a discharge diagnosis of probable ev
ent and gave an enhanced basis for a future validation study. Local registe
rs were not completely covered by the national register, but the accessible
combination of national in-patient and mortality registers was an efficien
t alternative.