Contrasting hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pervasive parallel
s in the patterning of arthropod and vertebrate appendages. These hypothese
s either call for a common ancestor already provided with patterned appenda
ges or body outgrowths, or for the recruitment in limb patterning of single
genes or genetic cassettes originally used for purposes other than axis pa
tterning. I suggest instead that body appendages such as arthropod and vert
ebrate limbs and chordate tails are evolutionarily divergent duplicates (pa
ramorphs) of the main body axis, that is, its duplicates, albeit devoid of
endodermal component. Thus, vertebrate limbs and arthropod limbs are not hi
storical homologs, but homoplastic features only transitively related to re
al historical homologs. Thus, the main body axis and the axis of the append
ages have distinct but not independent evolutionary histories and may be in
volved in processes of homeotic cc-option producing effects of morphologica
l assimilation. For instance, chordate segmentation may have originated in
the posterior appendage (tail) and subsequently extended to the trunk.