Representation and artistic normativity (20th century visual arts)

Authors
Citation
A. Erjavec, Representation and artistic normativity (20th century visual arts), FILOZ VESTN, 20(3), 1999, pp. 9-23
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Philosiphy
Journal title
FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK-ACTA PHILOSOPHICA
ISSN journal
03534510 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
9 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0353-4510(1999)20:3<9:RAAN(C>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Visual art of our century can be divided into two main forms, one being the traditional one (with much of modernist art acting in this regard as its e xtension) which privileges recognition and the pleasure such recognition of fers. The other is that which begins with ready-mades and continues with co nceptual and neo-conceptual art. Although in this second case theory is of much greater importance than in the first and precedes a work of art, the l atter can end up playing a similar role as traditional art, for it too may offer an indirect form of recognition. The precondition for this is that it functions as a social phenomenon, instead of erecting its artistic relevan ce solely on the act of production or creation. An artistic appreciation which defends the notion that all artworks are not equally art requires that the position of the Cartesian subject remains in tact for it is only in this way that the distancing gaze identified with th e aesthetic and artistic appreciation is achieved.