W. Mayoral et al., Nonmalignant obstruction is a common problem with metal stents in the treatment of esophageal cancer, GASTROIN EN, 51(5), 2000, pp. 556-559
Background: The use of metal stents for the treatment of dysphagia due to e
sophageal melignancy is an important advance because of ease of delivery an
d their self-expandable property. obstruction due to tumor overgrowth is a
recognized complication, but nonmalignant obstruction in patients with meta
l stents is rarely reported.
Methods: Database records of patients who had esophageal cancer and underwe
nt metal stent insertion were reviewed.
Results: A total of 116 patients were seen between October 1993 and October
1997. Four types of metal stents had been used (Ultraflex, Z Stent, Wallst
ent, and Esophacoil). Detailed follow-up Information was available for 81 p
atients, who constitute the study sample. Forty-nine (60%) stent obstructio
ns were reported, 26 of the 49 (53%) were due to tumor overgrowth and 23 (4
7%) were not associated with malignancy. Histologic analysis of the nonmali
gnant obstructing tissue showed granulation tissue (56%), reactive hyperpla
sia (22%) and fibrosis (22%).
Conclusions: Nonmalignant obstruction is a common although infrequently rep
orted complication after placement of metal stents for esophageal cancer. T
he tissue response of the esophageal mucosa occurred with all 4 types of st
ents used. No specific characteristic of the stent or prior treatment seems
to be related to obstruction of the stent in patients with either nonmalig
nant obstruction or tumor overgrowth.