Costing issues are increasingly being addressed in multi-centre studies. In
this paper, two methods for collecting costing information are compared wi
thin a simulated clinical trial setting. One method estimates average treat
ment costs by applying unit costs averaged across treatment centres to cent
re-specific volumes of resource use. The second uses centre-specific inform
ation for both the unit costs and the resource volumes, and then averages a
cross centres. Using a pre-specified production relation between the differ
ent volumes of resource use, and simulating changes in unit costs, it is sh
own that these two methods result in statistically different estimates of a
verage treatment costs. This finding holds, regardless of the degree of sub
stitutability between the resource volumes, except when considerable uncert
ainty surrounds treatment centre responses to relative changes in unit cost
s. The findings suggest that a more cautious approach should be adopted in
the collection, calculation and interpretation of treatment costs in multi-
centre studies. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.