We address the issue of statistical power and sample size for cost-effectiv
eness studies. Tests of hypotheses on the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) ar
e constructed from the net cost and incremental effectiveness measures. Whe
n the difference in effectiveness is known, we derive formulae for statisti
cal power and sample size assessments for one- and two-sided tests of hypot
heses of the CER. We also construct a test of the joint hypothesis of cost-
effectiveness and effectiveness and derive an expression connecting power a
nd sample size. Our methods account for the correlation between cost and ef
fectiveness and lead to smaller sample size requirements than comparative m
ethods that ignore the correlation. The implications of our formulae for co
st-effectiveness studies are illustrated through numerical examples. When c
ompared with trials designed to demonstrate effectiveness alone, our result
s indicate that a trial appropriately powered to demonstrate cost-effective
ness might require sample sizes many times greater. Copyright (C) 2000 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.