Fe. Johnson et al., How tumor stage affects American urologists' surveillance strategies afterprostate cancer surgery, INT J ONCOL, 16(6), 2000, pp. 1221-1225
The factors which influence decision-making among urologists are not well u
nderstood. We evaluated how tumor stage in patients subjected to potentiall
y curative surgery for carcinoma of the prostate affects the self-reported
follow-up strategies employed by practicing United States urologists. Stand
ardized patient profiles and a detailed questionnaire based on these profil
es were mailed to 4,467 randomly selected members of the American Urologica
l Association (AUA), comprising 3,205 US and 1,262 non-US urologists. The e
ffect of TNM stage on the surveillance strategies chosen by respondents was
analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA. There were 1,050 respondents who prov
ided evaluable data of whom 760 were from the US. The three most commonly u
sed surveillance modalities by urologists were office visit, serum PSR leve
l, and urinalysis. Nine of the 11 most commonly requested modalities were o
rdered significantly (p<0.001) more frequently with increasing TNM stage. T
his effect persisted through 10 years of follow-up, but the differences acr
oss stage were tiny. Fifty-five percent of US respondents do not modify the
ir strategies at all according to the patient's TNM stage. Most American AU
A members performing surveillance after potentially curative radical prosta
tectomy fur otherwise healthy patients use the same follow-up strategies ir
respective of TNM stage. These data permit the rational design of a randomi
zed clinical trial of two alternate follow-up plans. The two trial arms wou
ld employ office visits, blood tests, and urinalyses at different frequenci
es based on current actual practice patterns; there would be no imaging tes
ts in either arm.