Purpose: To assess the Value of imaging in the differential diagnosis of er
osive intervertebral osteochondrosis (EIVO) versus infectious discitis (ID)
.
Materials and methods: Twelve cases of EIVO and 30 cases of ID were reviewe
d to define the usefull signs for differential diagnosis on plain films, CT
, and MR.
Results: No single sign is sufficient, but the association of several signs
is suggestive of EIVO: discal vacuum phenomenom, weil-defined sclerosis an
d erosions of vertebral endplates, high signal strip surrounding low signal
of vertebral endplates on T1-weighted images.
Conclusion: Imaging is helpful in difficult differential diagnosis of EIVO
versus ID.