HIGH-DOSE CARBOPLATIN, ETOPOSIDE AND MELPHALAN (CEM) WITH PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL SUPPORT AS LATE INTENSIFICATION FOR HIGH-RISK CANCER - NONHEMATOLOGICAL, HEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITIES AND ROLE OF GROWTH-FACTOR ADMINISTRATION
Pb. Panici et al., HIGH-DOSE CARBOPLATIN, ETOPOSIDE AND MELPHALAN (CEM) WITH PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL SUPPORT AS LATE INTENSIFICATION FOR HIGH-RISK CANCER - NONHEMATOLOGICAL, HEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITIES AND ROLE OF GROWTH-FACTOR ADMINISTRATION, British Journal of Cancer, 75(8), 1997, pp. 1205-1212
The present report describes the non-haematological toxicity and the i
nfluence of growth factor administration on haematological toxicity an
d haematopoietic recovery observed after high-dose carboplatin (1200 m
g m(-2)), etoposide (900 mg m(-2)) and melphalan (100 mg m(-2)) (CEM)
followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) i
n 40 patients with high-risk cancer during their first-line treatment.
PBPCs were collected during the previous outpatient induction chemoth
erapy programme by leukaphereses. CEM administration with PBPCT was as
sociated with low non-haematological toxicity and the only significant
toxicity consisted of a reversible grade III/IV increase in liver enz
ymes in 32% of the patients. Haematopoietic recovery was very fast in
all patients and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte-macrophage col
ony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus EPO after PBPCT significantly red
uced haematological toxicity,abrogated antibiotic administration durin
g neutropenia and significantly reduced hospital stay and patient's ho
spital charge compared with patients treated with PBPCT only. None of
the patients died early of CEM plus PBPCT-related complications. Low n
on-haematological toxicity and accelerated haematopoietic recovery ren
ders CEM with PBPC/growth factor support an acceptable therapeutic app
roach in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.