Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations

Citation
Ja. Husted et al., Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations, J CLIN EPID, 53(5), 2000, pp. 459-468
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
08954356 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
459 - 468
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-4356(200005)53:5<459:MFARAC>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsi veness. We define the first as "internal responsiveness," which characteriz es the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and t he second as "external responsiveness," which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to corresponding change in a reference measure of clinical or health status. The properties and interpretation of commonly used internal and external responsiveness statistics are examined. It is f rom the interpretation point of view that external responsiveness statistic s are considered particularly attractive. The usefulness of regression mode ls for assessing external responsiveness is also highlighted. (C) 2000 Else vier Science Inc. All rights reserved.