Aspergillus antigen testing in bone marrow transplant recipients

Citation
Ecm. Williamson et al., Aspergillus antigen testing in bone marrow transplant recipients, J CLIN PATH, 53(5), 2000, pp. 362-366
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219746 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
362 - 366
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(200005)53:5<362:AATIBM>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Aims-To assess the clinical usefulness of a commercial aspergillus antigen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of invasive aspe rgillosis (IA) in bone marrow transplant recipients, and to compare it with a commercial latex agglutination (LA) test. Methods-In total, 2026 serum samples from 104 bone marrow transplant recipi ents were tested. These comprised 67 sera from seven patients who had died with confirmed IA, 268 sera from nine patients who had died with suspected IA, and 1691 sera from 88 patients with no clinical, radiological, or micro biological signs of IA. Results-The ELISA was more sensitive than the LA test. All patients who wer e ELISA positive were also LA positive, and a positive LA result never prec eded a positive ELISA. Twelve of 16 patients with confirmed or suspected IA were ELISA positive on two or more occasions, compared with 10 of 15 who w ere LA positive. ELISA was positive before LA in five patients (range, 2-14 days), and became positive on the same day in the remainder. Aspergillus a ntigen was detected by ELISA a median of 15 days before death (range, 4-233 ). Clinical and/or radiological evidence of IA was noted in all patients, a nd a positive ELISA was never the sole criterion for introduction of antifu ngal treatment. Two samples (one from each of two patients without IA) gave false positive results. Conclusions-The aspergillus ELISA is a specific indicator of invasive asper gillosis if the criterion of two positive samples is required to confirm th e diagnosis. However, the test is insufficiently sensitive to diagnose aspe rgillosis before other symptoms or signs are apparent, and hence is unlikel y to lead to earlier initiation of antifungal treatment. It is therefore un suitable for screening of asymptomatic patients at risk of invasive aspergi llosis, but does have a useful role in confirming the diagnosis in symptoma tic patients.