Ld. De Vries et al., Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography, and hysteroscopy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding, J CLIN ULTR, 28(5), 2000, pp. 217-223
Purpose. Saline infusion sonography (SIS) is a relatively new technique in
the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. We compared the diagnostic acc
uracy of SIS with that of transvaginal sonography (NS) in the detection of
intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bl
eeding.
Methods. In this prospective study, consecutive premenopausal women who und
erwent a hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding also underwent TVS and
SIS. The findings at TVS and SIS were compared with the hysteroscopic and h
istologic findings, Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were ca
lculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to asse
ss the performance of endometrial thickness measured using TVS.
Results. Sixty-two patients were included in the study, TVS demonstrated 60
% sensitivity in directly visualizing intracavitary abnormalities and 93% s
pecificity. The likelihood ratio of the presence of an intracavitary abnorm
ality was 8, and the likelihood ratio of the absence of an intracavitary ab
normality was 0.43. Defining an abnormality at TVS as direct visualization
of an intracavitary abnormality or an endometrial thickness greater than 5
mm, TVS had an 85% sensitivity and a 21% specificity, with corresponding li
kelihood ratios of 1.1 and 0.71, respectively. For SIS, the sensitivity, sp
ecificity, and likelihood ratios of the presence and absence of intracavita
ry abnormalities were 88%, 95%, 10, and 0.13, respectively.
Conclusions. SIS is more accurate in the diagnosis of intracavitary abnorma
lities in premenopausal women than is TVS. An approach using endometrial th
ickness measurement by TVS and reserving SIS for patients who have an endom
etrial thickness greater than 5 mm or an intracavitary abnormality visualiz
ed by TVS would be the most effective method to reduce the number of hyster
oscopies. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.