Rl. Kravitz et al., A Taxonomy of Requests by Patients (TORP) - A new system for understandingclinical negotiation in office practice, J FAM PRACT, 48(11), 1999, pp. 872-878
BACKGROUND. The goal of our investigation was to facilitate research on cli
nical negotiation between patients and physicians by developing a reliable
and valid classification system for patients' requests in office practice.
METHODS. We developed the Taxonomy of Requests by Patients (TORP) using inp
ut from researchers, clinicians, and patient focus groups. To assess the sy
stem's reliability and validity, we applied TORP to audiotaped encounters b
etween 139 patients and 6 northern California internists, Reliability was a
ssessed with the kappa statistic as a measure of interrater agreement. Face
validity was assessed through expert and patient judgment of the coding sy
stem. Content validity was examined by monitoring the incidence of unclassi
fiable requests. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the relation
ship between patient requests and patient health status; patient request fu
lfillment and patient satisfaction; and patient requests and physician perc
eptions of the visit.
RESULTS. The 139 patients made 772 requests (619 requests for information a
nd 153 requests for physician action). Average interrater agreement across
a sample of 40 cases was 94% (kappa = 0.93; P < .001). Patients with better
health status made fewer requests (r = -0.17; P = .048). Having more chron
ic diseases was associated with more requests for physician action (r = 0.3
2; P = .0002). Patients with more unfulfilled requests had lower visit sati
sfaction (r = -0.32; P < .001). More patient requests was also associated w
ith physician reports of longer visit times (P = .016) and increased visit
demands (P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS, Our study provides evidence that TORP is a reliable and valid
system for capturing and categorizing patients' requests in adult primary c
are. Further research is needed to confirm the system's validity, expand it
s applicability, and explore its usefulness as a tool for studying clinical
negotiation.