Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEAVS experiment and a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements
E. Andrews et al., Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEAVS experiment and a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements, J AIR WASTE, 50(5), 2000, pp. 648-664
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
We summarize the results from the various measurements and the inter-sample
r comparisons from Southeastern Aerosol and Visibility Study (SEAVS), a stu
dy with one of its objectives to test for closure among chemical, gravimetr
ic and optical measurements of atmospheric aerosol particles. Sulfate and o
rganics are the dominant components of the SEAVS fine particles (nominally,
particles with aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 mu m) but be
tween 28 and 42% (range over various samplers) of the gravimetrically measu
red total fine particle concentration is unidentified by the chemical measu
rements. Estimates of water associated with inorganic components and measur
ement imprecision do not totally explain the observed difference between gr
avimetric and chemical measurements. We examine the theoretical and empiric
al basis for assumptions commonly made in the published literature to extra
polate total fine particle concentration on the basis of chemical measureme
nts of ions, carbon and elements.
We then explore the more general question of closure using the SEAVS data a
s well as data from other, similar studies reported in the literature. In s
o combining the SEAVS measurements with Other similar studies, we find a st
rong association between organic carbon and the unidentified component, tha
t is, the fraction of the total fine particle concentration not identified
by chemical measurements. We offer several tenable hypotheses for the relat
ionship between the organic and unidentified components that deserve to be
tested in future work. Specifically, we hypothesize that (1) errors in the
sampling and analysis of organic carbon; (2) estimates of organic mass from
measurements of organic carbon; and/or (3) water absorption by organics ma
y all contribute to the observed relationship.