Prehospital resuscitation with phenylephrine in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and brain injury

Citation
Dm. Alspaugh et al., Prehospital resuscitation with phenylephrine in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and brain injury, J TRAUMA, 48(5), 2000, pp. 851-863
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Volume
48
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
851 - 863
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Background: Hypotension doubles the adverse outcome of severe brain injury (BT), This finding is thought to be due to secondary ischemia caused by cer ebral hypoperfusion, Aggressive prehospital fluid resuscitation in BI is ad vocated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP). Increasing MAP by prehosp ital fluid resuscitation before control of hemorrhage is thought to increas e blood loss and reduce survival. We hypothesized that vasoconstrictor trea tment of uncontrolled hemorrhage would increase MAP, reduce hemorrhage volu me, and decrease the extent of BI compared with delayed fluid resuscitation (DR) or resuscitation with Ringer's lactate (RL). Methods: Swine were randomly assigned to a control group or an experimental group: splenic laceration (uncontrolled hemorrhage) and cryogenic BI. The experimental group received one of three prehospital resuscitation regimens : DR, RL, or phenylephrine (Phen) to maintain baseline MAP. Variables were measured at baseline and at 20, 50, and 120 minutes during the simulated "p rehospital and early hospital" phases and at 2 and 8 hours after surgical c ontrol of the uncontrolled hemorrhage. After killing, biopsies of the brain , liver, kidney, and gut mere evaluated for histologic evidence of ischemia and compared between groups. Results: Hemorrhage volume was similar in the experimental groups. Mortalit y was lowest in the Phen group (11%) compared with DR (40%) and RL (33%) gr oups. Phen increased MAP and cerebral perfusion pressure. RL infusion incre ased cerebral blood flow and resulted in less secondary injury than either Phen or DR. Conclusion: Phen improves MAP and systemic and cerebral perfusion pressure in the prehospital phase but does not reduce secondary neuronal ischemia, R L restores cerebral blood flow earlier and is associated with less secondar y ischemia than either Phen or DR in this model. These data suggest that pr ehospital infusion of RL in patients with BI and shock is warranted and dec reases secondary ischemia.