Background: Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) has been well re
ported in adults, but its applicability in children is less well establishe
d. We decided to test the hypothesis that PAST and computed tomography (CT)
are equivalent imaging studies in the setting of pediatric blunt abdominal
trauma.
Methods: One hundred seven hemodynamically stable children undergoing CT fo
r blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively investigated using FAST. The ab
ility of FAST to predict injury by detecting free intraperitoneal fluid was
compared with CT as the imaging standard.
Results: Thirty-two patients had CT documented injuries. There were no late
injuries missed by CT. FAST detected free fluid in 12 patients. Ten patien
ts had solid organ injury but no free fluid and, thus, were not detected by
FAST. The sensitivity of FAST relative to CT was only 0.55 and the negativ
e predictive value was only 0.50.
Conclusion: FAST has insufficient sensitivity and negative predictive value
to be used as a screening imaging test in hemodynamically stable children
with blunt abdominal trauma.