Purpose: We evaluate our experience with de novo reimplantation of the arti
ficial genitourinary sphincter with a particular emphasis on mechanical and
nonmechanical failure rates. De novo reimplantation is defined as implanta
tion of an artificial sphincter following removal of a previously placed sp
hincter for erosion and/or infection and a waiting period of several months
.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of more than 400 patients w
ith an artificial sphincter revealed 23 who underwent de novo reimplantatio
n between January 1983 and October 1998. All patients were men with a mean
age of 66.5 years (range 16 to 88) and all had a urethral cuff. Reasons for
cuff removal were erosion in 12 cases (52.2%), infection in 10 (43.5%) and
intraoperative urethral injury in 1 (4.3%). Mean waiting period was 6.8 mo
nths (range 1.5 to 32) between explantation and de novo reimplantation. Mea
n followup was 32.6 months (range 1 to 108).
Results: Of the 23 patients 20 (87%) had no mechanical or nonmechanical fai
lures and 3 (13%) had nonmechanical failures, including 2 patients (8.7%) w
hose cuff eroded into the urethra and 1 (4.3%) who had recurrent urinary in
continence which was successfully treated with implantation of a tandem cuf
f. There were no mechanical failures or infections in this group of patient
s.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that de novo artificial sphincter reimplant
ation is an excellent treatment option. It is safe and associated with comp
lication rates that are comparable to those of primary implantation.