Bc. Leibovich et al., Outcome prediction with p53 immunostaining after radical prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, J UROL, 163(6), 2000, pp. 1756-1760
Purpose: Conventional pathological variables in prostate cancer may not pro
vide optimal prediction of patient outcome. Pathological findings and p53 i
mmunostaining were measured prospectively in radical prostatectomy specimen
s to determine the incremental improvement in prediction of patient outcome
over clinical findings.
Materials and Methods: From a previous prospective study of 392 consecutive
patients with prostate cancer who did not receive preoperative therapy and
were treated with radical prostatectomy 25 had pathological stage pT3aN0M0
, 24 had pT3bN0M0, 2 had pT2bN1M0, 7 had pT3aN1M0 and 14 had pT3bN1 prostat
e cancer. These locally advanced stage cases comprise the current study pop
ulation and further analysis was done with p53 immunostaining, All prostate
specimens were totally embedded, serially sectioned and whole mounted. We
examined pathological, clinical and laboratory findings as well as p53 immu
nostaining.
Results: Median followup was 5.4 years (range 0.5 to 6.4). Univariate analy
sis revealed that pathological stage, 10% or greater immunostaining for p53
, area and length of extraprostatic cancer extension, and cancer volume (al
l p less than or equal to 0.03) were associated with biochemical (prostate
specific antigen) or clinical failure. When all variables were considered i
n stepwise multivariate analysis none attained statistical significance aft
er p53 status entered the model (p <0.01, risk ratio 2.9 for 10% or greater
versus less than 10%, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.2). The concordance in
dex analysis for the predictive ability of prostate specific antigen, stage
, grade and ploidy (c = 0.66) was inferior to the predictive ability of a s
tatistical model also including p53 status (c = 0.71).
Conclusions: In cases of locally advanced stage cancer p53 immunoreactivity
after radical prostatectomy improves outcome prediction. Addition of this
variable to those routinely determined may identify a subset of patients wh
o would benefit from more intensive postoperative surveillance and adjuvant
therapy.