Detection of circulating prostate derived cells in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma is an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence

Citation
A. Mejean et al., Detection of circulating prostate derived cells in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma is an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence, J UROL, 163(6), 2000, pp. 2022-2029
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
163
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2022 - 2029
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200006)163:6<2022:DOCPDC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether the presence of prostate-derived cells in the peripheral blood circulation is a marker of prostate cancer and to define the clinical impact of the test. Materials and Methods: We tested the peripheral blood of 99 patients with p rostate adenocarcinoma (PAC), 79 of them undergoing radical prostatectomy, and 92 controls (31 healthy volunteers, 50 patients with adenoma and 11 wit h prostatitis) using a highly controlled procedure including reverse-transc riptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeted to prostate-specific an tigen (PSA) mRNA. Patients were followed for 26 +/- 12 (range: 4 to 49) mon ths. Forty tumor tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expressi on of p53 and E-cadherin antigens. Results: Thirty three (33%) patients with PAC and 2 (2%) controls scored po sitive (p <0.0001) for the test. Detection of circulating prostatic cells w as associated with development of metastases (p <0.001), with relapse (p <0 .001) and with a serum PSA level at diagnosis higher than 15 ng./ml. (p = 0 .009). The rate of development of metastases according to time was signific antly higher in patients who scored positive for the test (p <0.04). In a m ultivariate analysis, only the RT-PCR test was an independent risk factor a ssociated with relapse (RR: 6.7). Finally, E-cadherin expression was signif icantly lower in the tumor tissues of positive patients as compared with th ose who scored negative for the test (p <0.01). Conclusions: This RT-PCR procedure, performed at diagnosis and with appropr iate controls, is a clinically useful assay in evaluating the risk of tumor recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with PAC.