To assess differences between object and pixel-based reservoir modeling tec
hniques, ten realizations of a UK Continental Shelf braided fluvial reservo
ir were produced using Boolean Simulation (BS) and Sequential Indicator Sim
ulation (SIS). Various sensitivities associated with geological input data
as well as with technique-specific modeling parameters were analyzed for bo
th techniques. The resulting realizations from the object-based and pixel-b
ased modeling efforts were assessed by visual inspection and by evaluation
of the values and ranges of the single-phase effective permeability tensors
, obtained through upscaling. The BS method performed well for the modeling
of two types of fluvial channels, yielding well-confined channels, but fai
led to represent the complex interaction of these with sheetflood and other
deposits present in the reservoir. SIS gave less confined channels and had
great difficulty in representing the large-scale geometries of one type of
channel while maintaining its appropriate proportions. Adding an SIS backg
round to the Boolean channels, as opposed to a Boolean background, resulted
in an improved distribution of sheetflood bodies. The permeability results
indicated that the SIS method yielded models with much higher horizontal p
ermeability values (20 - 100%) and lower horizontal anisotropy than the BS
versions. By widening the channel distribution and increasing the range of
azimuths, however, the BS-produced models gave results approaching the SIS
behavior. For this reservoir, we chose to combine the two methods by using
object-based channels and a pixel-based heterogeneous background, resulting
in moderate permeability and anisotropy levels.