Considerable taxonomic confusion exists regarding many species of Cantharel
lus. Several taxa have been classified in either Cantharellus or Craterellu
s depending on which morphological characters were emphasised. Recent phylo
genetic studies based on sequence analyses suggest that some species now cl
assified in Cantharellus should be in Craterellus. We extracted DNA from dr
ied herbarium specimens and amplified, sequenced and cladistically analysed
approximately 650 bp of the 5' end of the nuclear large subunit ribosomal
DNA gene. Our data confirm earlier results and provide molecular evidence f
or the classification of additional Cantharellus species (Ca. ignicolor and
Ca. lutescens) within Craterellus. Furthermore, the data enable us to pred
ict that all Leptocantharellus-like species currently classified within Can
tharellus are more accurately classified within Craterellus. The species co
mplexes of Cr. tubaeformis and Cr. cornucopioides were also investigated. T
hese analyses did not support the monophyly of Ca. tubaeformis but the hypo
thesis that colour varieties of Cu. cornucopioides represent separate speci
es was rejected.