Animals and plants defend themselves against a variable community of biolog
ical enemies. We argue that the effectiveness of allocation to defence (the
success of defence per unit allocation) may be expected to decrease as the
diversity of attack types increases, and asked how the optimal allocation
to defence covaries with the effectiveness of defence. Variation in effecti
veness links optimal defence to coevolutionary processes the prime characte
ristic of coevolutionary interactions is that they promote and maintain gen
etic variation in both hosts and their enemies, leading to variation in the
effectiveness of defence. We present a simple model suggesting that as eff
ectiveness decreases, the fitness benefit of defence disappears. In other w
ords, when effectiveness is low, the optimal strategy is to tolerate damage
. As effectiveness increases, the optimal allocation flips rapidly from no-
defence (tolerance) to high allocation to defence, and then decreases at a
decelerating pace as effectiveness increases. We conclude that diversifying
coevolution; as it covaries with the effectiveness of defence, constrains
the evolution of optimal defence strategies and may be a very important com
ponent in determining the optimal allocation to defence and variation in th
e success of defence as it is seen in the wild.