Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the two accepted mech
anisms of the orbital blowout fracture (the hydraulic and the buckling theo
ries) from a clinical, experimental, and theoretical standpoint.
Methods: Clinical cases in which blowout fractures resulted from both a pur
e hydraulic mechanism and a pure buckling mechanism are presented. Twenty-o
ne intact orbital floors were obtained from human cadavers. A metal rod was
dropped, experimentally, onto each specimen until a fracture was produced,
and the energy required in each instance was calculated. A biomathematical
model of the human bony orbit, depicted as a thin-walled truncated conical
shell, was devised. Two previously published (by the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration) theoretical structural engineering formulas for t
he fracture of thin-walled truncated conical shells were used to predict th
e energy required to fracture the bone of the orbital floor via the hydraul
ic and buckling mechanisms.
Results: Experimentally, the mean energy required to fracture the bone of t
he human cadaver orbital floor directly was 78 millijoules (mJ) (range, 29-
127 mJ). Using the engineering formula for the hydraulic theory, the predic
ted theoretical energy is 71 mi (range, 38-120 mi), for the buckling theory
, the predicted theoretical energy is 68 mi (range, 40-106 mi).
Conclusion: Through this study, we have experimentally determined the amoun
t of energy required to fracture the bone of the human orbital floor direct
ly and have provided support for each mechanism of the orbital blowout frac
ture from a clinical and theoretical basis.