Accuracy of MR imaging for detecting epiphyseal extension of osteosarcoma

Citation
Fa. Hoffer et al., Accuracy of MR imaging for detecting epiphyseal extension of osteosarcoma, PEDIAT RAD, 30(5), 2000, pp. 289-298
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03010449 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
289 - 298
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0449(200005)30:5<289:AOMIFD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background. Too few patients are receiving epiphyseal-sparing limb salvage procedures for osteosarcoma. Objective. To determine how magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can best predic t the epiphyseal extension of osteosarcoma. Materials and methods. Forty children underwent complete pretreatment stati c and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DEMRI). Static MR images [T1-we ighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR)] of the epiphyses were read in three ways: (1) for suspicion of any abnormality (tumor or edema), (2) f or suspicion of tumor, excluding suspected edema, and (3) validating the se cond method by using a scale to rate the likelihood of tumor. Presentation imaging was compared to histopathologic findings after chemotherapy and res ection. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to anal yze the scaled ratings of static MR and DEMRI values. Results. At delayed resection, 20 of 40 children with osteosarcoma had conf irmed epiphyseal tumor; however, 32 epiphyses were abnormal on STIR and 28 abnormal on T1. Differentiating suspected tumor from edema increased the ac curacy to an A(z) (area under the ROC curve) of 0.94 for both T1-weighted a nd STIR static sequences. T1-weighted MR had better specificity and STIR be tter sensitivity at any given rating. DEMRI was slightly less accurate (Az = 0.90). Conclusion. Static MR imaging most accurately detected epiphyseal extension of osteosarcoma when readers distinguished suspected tumor from edematous or normal tissue.