Two experiments investigated how individual differences in attention to emo
tion influence the rob of affect in judgments of risk. In Experiment 1, moo
d influenced the judgments of individuals high, but not low, in attention t
o emotion. When an attribution manipulation made a cause of their feelings
salient, individuals high in emotional attention no longer perceived their
feelings as relevant and were not influenced by them; whereas those low in
emotional attention now paid attention to them and were influenced by them.
This manipulation had these effects when it was presented prior to, but no
t in the middle of a series of judgments. In Experiment 2, differences in r
esponse to the attribution manipulation disappeared when participants' perc
eptions of the relevance of their feelings were governed Iri instructions t
o use either feelings or facts as a basis for judgment. The results suggest
that feelings influence judgment when they seem relevant.