Enhanced coding in a cochlear-implant model using additive noise: Aperiodic stochastic resonance with tuning

Citation
Rp. Morse et P. Roper, Enhanced coding in a cochlear-implant model using additive noise: Aperiodic stochastic resonance with tuning, PHYS REV E, 61(5), 2000, pp. 5683-5692
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Physics
Journal title
PHYSICAL REVIEW E
ISSN journal
1063651X → ACNP
Volume
61
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Part
B
Pages
5683 - 5692
Database
ISI
SICI code
1063-651X(200005)61:5<5683:ECIACM>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Analog electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve (the nerve of hearing) by a cochlear implant is an effective method of providing functional hearin g to profoundly deaf people. Recent physiological and computational experim ents have shown that analog cochlear implants are unlikely to convey certai n speech cues by che temporal pattern of evoked nerve discharges. However, these experiments have also shown that the optimal addition of noise to coc hlear implant signals can enhance the temporal representation of speech cue s [R. P. Morse and E. F. Evans, Nature Medicine 2, 928 (1996)]. We present a simple model to explain this enhancement of temporal representation. Our model derives from a rate equation for the mean threshold-crossing rate of an infinite set of parallel discriminators (level-crossing detectors); a sy stem that well describes the time coding of information by a set of nerve f ibers. Our results show that the optimal transfer of information occurs whe n the threshold level of each discriminator is equal to the root-mean-squar e noise level. The optimal transfer of information by a cochlear implant is therefore expected to occur when the internal root-mean-square noise level of each stimulated fiber is approximately equal to the nerve threshold. Wh en interpreted within the framework of aperiodic stochastic resonance, our results indicate therefore that for an infinite array of discriminators, a timing of the noise is still necessary for optimal performance. This is in contrast to previous results [Collins, Chow, and Imhoff, Nature 376, 236 (1 995); Chialvo, Longtin, and Muller-Gerking, Phys. Rev. E 55, 1798 (1997)] o n arrays of FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons.