Id. Carpenter et Pg. Maropoulos, Automatic tool selection for milling operations Part 2: tool sorting and variety reduction, P I MEC E B, 214(4), 2000, pp. 283-292
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering Management /General
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE
The first part of this paper introduced a procedure for rapidly calculating
optimized cutting data for all the feasible tools for a given milling oper
ation. Having produced this list of tools with associated optimized cutting
conditions, the preferred tool is selected by sorting the list by a compos
ite objective function incorporating a combination of four desirable condit
ions: maximum metal removal rate, maximum tool life, minimum overall cost a
nd minimum overall cutting time. These four criteria are normalized by a co
nstant multiplier and prioritized by user-defined weighting coefficients. T
he tool selection procedure is implemented in software with a graphical use
r interface. The system includes material data for more than 750 ferrous al
loys and specifications for 35988 possible holder/insert combinations. Seve
ral examples are presented to demonstrate the capability of the system and
the subtle interplay of technological constraints that makes optimized tool
selection a difficult process to perform manually. This automated procedur
e offers consistent selection of tools with efficient cutting data that can
produce considerable reductions in machining cost when compared with non-o
ptimal solutions.
This tool selection procedure is designed to select tools and associated cu
tting conditions for single milling operations. As many machining centres h
ave a limited number of tool positions available for automated tool changin
g, it is possible that the optimal set of tools for a given component is no
t the set of tools that are optimal for each operation considered singly. A
post-processing method is presented which rationalizes a set of tools so a
s to reduce the number of unique tools with the minimal decrease in perform
ance when compared with the set of individually optimized tools.