Js. Jensen et S. Heim, Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees, PROS ORTHOT, 24(1), 2000, pp. 47-54
Thirty-two (32) trained prosthesis users with 34 trans-tibial amputations,
mostly due to war, were fitted with prostheses fabricated from polypropylen
e (PP) prosthetic components designed and manufactured by the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The patients were followed prospectivel
y for 10 and 19 months. All but one patient had at least one other type of
prosthesis to compare with.
Twenty-eight (28) patients were satisfied with the PP prosthesis. Among the
se 23 found the PP prosthesis the preferred artificial limb, and one patien
t found the PP limb equal to the aluminium prosthesis previously in use. In
6/28 patients having an aluminium (ALU) prostheses this was found the best
, and the 1 already mentioned found it equivalent to the new technology. In
only 1/20 cases having an Automated Fabrication of Mobility Aids (AFMA) pr
osthesis available this was found the best. One (1) double-amputee found al
l three designs equal.
Minor failures of the PP prostheses were encountered; in 4 cases small crac
ks in the hard socket; in 3 cases cracks of the cosmetic socket seam. From
an overall prospect the PP technology can be recommended for trans-tibial p
rostheses.