Background. The Well-being Questionnaire (W-BQ) has been designed to measur
e psychological well-being in people with a chronic somatic illness and is
recommended by the World Health Organization for widespread use. However, s
tudies into the factor structure of this instrument are still limited and t
heir findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the factor
structure of the Dutch version of the W-BQ.
Methods. A cross-validation design was used. A total of 1472 people with di
abetes completed the W-BQ and were randomly assigned to group A or B. In gr
oup A (N = 736), exploratory factor analyses were conducted. Group B (N = 7
36) was split up into four subgroups of male or female patients with type 1
or type 2 diabetes. In these subgroups, confirmatory factor analyses were
employed to test the model(s) developed in group A and the two models descr
ibed in the literature (four-factor model with 22 items and a three-factor
model with 12 items).
Results. Exploratory factor analyses yielded a three-factor model with 21 i
tems (negative well-being, energy and positive well-being). In the subgroup
s of group B confirmatory factor analyses only accepted the three-factor mo
del with 12 items. This factor solution was stable across gender, type of d
iabetes and level of education.
Conclusions. The best description of the factor structure of the Dutch tran
slation of the W-BQ was given by a three-factor solution with 12 items (W-B
Q12), measuring positive well-being (four items), negative well-being (four
items) and energy (four items).