Factors causing differences in voiding parameters between conventional andambulatory urodynamics

Voiding parameter values measured with ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AM ) are generally found to be different From those measured with conventional cystometry (CMG). The reason for this is unclear, but might be related to differences in the voided volume. To verify this hypothesis, we compared vo idings from female patients at an initial bladder volume that was close to the modal volume (that is, the volume most often voided by the patient as d erived from frequency/volume charts) with voidings at maximum cystometric c apacity during a routine video urodynamic examination. A first group of 35 patients voided at the modal volume before they did at capacity. The order was reversed in a second group of 12 patients. The dependence of the voidin g parameters on the voided volume and the order of the measurements were ex amined, It was found that the maximum Now rate depended significantly on th e voided volume, but the associated detrusor pressure did not. Urethral res istance and bladder contraction strength were not volume dependent either. It was concluded that the differences between AM and CMG cannot be explaine d from possible differences in the Voided volume.