Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps

OBJECTIVE. We compared the findings of time-efficient CT colonography with complete two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) CT colonography an d conventional colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-two patients undergoing colonoscopy screening w ere examined with CT colonography before endoscopy, Data were examined foll owing one of two methods. In method 1, axial 2D data sets were examined in a cine mode. If findings were suggestive of abnormality, focal areas were e xamined with 3D CT colonography. In method 2, data sets were examined exact ly as in method 1, and subsequent to that review. data sets were examined w ith simultaneous 3D "fly-through" CT colonography (surface-rendered images) and multiplanar reformatted images, The time required to examine CT colono graphy using each technique was recorded and abnormal findings were documen ted. Results of methods 1 and 2 were compared with findings on colonoscopy. RESULTS. Colonoscopy detected 16 polyps in 13 patients (polyp size, 2-10 mm ). Ten polyps measured 5 mm or less, five measured between 6 and 9 mm, and one measured 10 mm or more. Using method 1, two of 10 polyps measuring less than 5 mm, three of five polyps measuring between 6 and 9 mm, and one poly p measuring 10 mm were detected. We noted no false-positive polyps. Average evaluation time was 16 min. With method 2, the same polyps were seen as wi th method 1. No additional polyps were detected, and the average evaluation time was 40 min. CONCLUSION. Axial 2D CT colonography can be performed quickly and is compar able with complete 2D and 3D CT colonography in detecting colorectal polyps .