Dm. Proca et al., MOC31 immunoreactivity in primary and metastatic carcinoma of the liver - Report of findings and review of other utilized markers, APPL IMMUNO, 8(2), 2000, pp. 120-125
Differentiating between primary tumors of the liver and metastatic lesions
can, at times, be difficult. Various histochemical and immunohistochemical
methods have been used in an effort to better delineate between hepatocellu
lar carcinoma (HCC), especially the microglandular variant, primary cholang
iocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma; these ancillary studies can yie
ld less than satisfactory results. Recently, anti-MOC31, a monoclonal antib
ody directed against a cell surface glycoprotein, has been shown to be help
ful in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma and mesothelioma. This study a
ddresses whether this antibody might be helpful in distinguishing between H
CC, primary cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma in the liver.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 15 HCC (including 1
0 microglandular variants), 14 primary cholangiocarcinomas, and 33 metastat
ic adenocarcinomas (7 colon, 1 lung, 8 breast, 4 GE jct/gastric, 9 pancreas
, 2 small intestine, 1 renal 1 ovary) were immunostained with anti-MOC31 (1
:40, Dako) after protease digestion and biotin block using a modified ABC t
echnique. Positive staining was limited to membrane based reactivity; contr
ols stained appropriately. Immunoreactivity for MOC31 was observed in 14 of
14 cholangiocarcinomas and 33 of 33 metastatic tumors. Staining was diffus
e, intense, and readily interpretable, with rare exceptions. All 15 cases o
f HCC were negative. We conclude that cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic ade
nocarcinoma from a variety of sites express MOC31: HCC is uniformly negativ
e for this marker. Anti-MOC31 may prove useful in the evaluation of liver n
eoplasms where primary hepatocellular and adenocarcinoma enter the differen
tial diagnosis; it is not useful in separating primary cholangiocarcinoma f
rom metastatic adenocarcinoma.