Background-Salbutamol is frequently used as a bronchodilator for infants wh
o wheeze. Many single dose studies have questioned its effectiveness.
Aims-To investigate the response of wheezy infants to salbutamol over an ex
tended time period in order to elucidate either symptomatic relief or a pro
tective effect.
Methods-Eighty infants under 1 year, with persistent or recurrent wheeze an
d a personal or family history of atopy, were recruited to a randomised, do
uble blind, cross over, placebo controlled trial. Salbutamol (200 mu g thre
e times daily) or placebo were administered regularly over two consecutive
treatment periods of four weeks via a spacer and mask. Symptoms of wheeze a
nd cough were recorded in a diary. At the end of the study pulmonary functi
on tests were performed before and after salbutamol (400 mu g).
Results-Forty eight infants completed the diary study; 40 infants underwent
pulmonary function testing. No difference in mean daily symptom score was
observed between the salbutamol and placebo periods. There was no differenc
e in the number of symptom free days. Compliance and forced expiratory flow
s remained unchanged and resistance increased following salbutamol. There w
as no relation between the response measured by symptom score or pulmonary
function in individual patients.
Conclusion-In wheezy infants with an atopic background, there was no signif
icant beneficial effect of salbutamol on either clinical symptoms or pulmon
ary function. Clinical effects could not be predicted from pulmonary functi
on tests. Salbutamol cannot be recommended as the bronchodilator of choice
in this age group.