Lve. Koopmans et al., A time-delay determination from VLA light curves of the CLASS gravitational lens B1600+434, ASTRON ASTR, 356(2), 2000, pp. 391-402
We present Very Large Array (VLA) 8.5-GHz light curves of the two lens imag
es of the Cosmic Lens All Sky Survey (CLASS) gravitational lens B1600+434.
We find a nearly linear decrease of 18-19% in the flux densities of both le
ns images over a period of eight months (February-October) in 1998. Additio
nally, the brightest image A shows modulations up to 11% peak-to-peak on sc
ales of days to weeks over a large part of the observing period. Image B va
ries significantly less on this time scale. We conclude that most of the sh
ort-term variability in image A is not intrinsic source variability, but is
most likely caused by microlensing in the lens galaxy. The alternative, sc
intillation by the ionized Galactic ISM, is shown to be implausible based o
n its strong opposite frequency dependent behavior compared with results fr
om multi-frequency WSRT monitoring observations (Koopmans & de Bruyn 1999).
From these VLA light curves we determine a median time delay between the le
ns images of 47(-6)(+5), d (68%) or 47(-9)(+12) d (95%). We use two differe
nt methods to derive the time delay; both give the same result within the e
rrors. We estimate an additional systematic error between -8 and +7 d. If t
he mass distribution of lens galaxy can be described by an isothermal model
(Koopmans, de Bruyn & Jackson 1998), this time delay would give a value fo
r the Hubble parameter H-0=57(-11)(+14) (95% statistical) (+26)(-15) (syste
matic) km s(-1) Mpc(-1) (Omega(m)=1 and Omega(Lambda)=0). Similarly, the Mo
dified-Hubble-Profile mass model would give H-0=74(-15)(+18) (95% statistic
al) (+22)(-22) (systematic) km s(-1) Mpc(-1) For Omega(m)=0.3 and Omega(Lam
bda)=0.7, these values increase by 5.4%. We emphasize that the slope of the
radial mass profile of the lens-galaxy dark-matter halo in B1600+434 is ex
tremely ill-constrained. Hence, an accurate determination of Ho from this s
ystem is very difficult, if no additional constraints on the mass model are
obtained. These values of Ho should therefore be regarded as indicative.
Once H-0 (from independent methods) and the time delay have been determined
with sufficient accuracy, it will prove more worthwhile to constrain the r
adial mass profile of the dark-matter halo around the edge-on spiral lens g
alaxy at z=0.4.