Clinical features of 31 patients with systemic contact dermatitis due to the ingestion of Rhus (lacquer)

Citation
Sd. Park et al., Clinical features of 31 patients with systemic contact dermatitis due to the ingestion of Rhus (lacquer), BR J DERM, 142(5), 2000, pp. 937-942
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
142
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
937 - 942
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(200005)142:5<937:CFO3PW>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
In Korea, Rhus has been used as a folk medicine to cure gastrointestinal di seases and as a health food, We review the clinicopathological and laborato ry findings in patients with systemic contact dermatitis caused by intake o f Rhus. We reviewed medical records and histopathological sections from 31 patients during a 10-year period. The male/female ratio was 1.4 : 1 and the average age was 43.8 years (range 22-70). Ten patients (32%) had a known h istory of allergy to lacquer. Rhus was ingested to treat gastrointestinal p roblems including indigestion and gastritis (45%), and as a health food (39 %), in cooked meat, in herbal medicine, or taken by inhalation. The patient s developed skin lesions such as a maculopapular eruption (65%), erythema m ultiforme (EM, 32%), erythroderma (19%), pustules, purpura, weals and blist ers. Erythroderma was very frequent in patients with a known history of all ergy to lacquer, but maculopapular and EM-type eruptions were more frequent ly observed in those without a history of allergy All patients experienced generalized or localized pruritus. Other symptoms included gastrointestinal problems (32%), fever (26%), chills and headache; many developed leucocyto sis (70%) with neutrophilia (88%), while some showed toxic effects on liver and kidney. Fifty-nine per cent of patients observed cutaneous or general symptoms within a day after ingestion of Rhus. There was no difference in t he time lag for symptoms to develop between patients allergic and not aller gic to Rhus. All patients responded well to treatment with systemic steroid s and antihistamines. Common histopathological findings were vascular dilat ation, perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltration, and extravasation of re d blood cells in the upper dermis. Rhus lacquer should not be ingested in v iew of its highly allergic and toxic effects.