Ew. Lang et Rm. Chesnut, A bedside method for investigating the integrity and critical thresholds of cerebral pressure autoregulation in severe traumatic brain injury patients, BR J NEUROS, 14(2), 2000, pp. 117-126
To avoid ischaemic secondary insults after severe head injury (SHI) it woul
d be helpful to know the relationship between cerebral perfusion pressure (
CPP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). Static cerebrovascular autoregulation
(AR) was tested in 14 patients after SHI. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was
varied to detect changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) indicative of inta
ct AR. Three types of responses were observed: (1) MAP elevation causes an
increase in ICP; (2) MAP elevation has no or very little effect on ICP; (3)
MAP elevation lowers ICP; Changes between types 1/2 and type 3 suggests AR
breakpoints. Varying response types and breakpoints were observed between
and within patients. Lower AR breakpoints were seen from 60 to 80 mmHg CPP,
upper breakpoints were as high as 112. CPP monitoring achieves a twofold u
tility in targeted therapy: (1) defining the range of intact AR; and (2) lo
wer AR breakpoint assessment to avoid secondary insults. Although the preci
se relationship between pAR breakpoints and the adequacy of cerebral perfus
ion to meet metabolic needs remains unclear, a technique such as described
here is simple and has much to offer in targeting therapy toward specific p
athophysiological processes in traumatic brain injury.