This paper focuses on labour market adjustment during the economic crisis o
f 1997-98. It shows how labour processes help explain better outcomes for t
he poor than were initially predicted. The Indonesian experience is viewed
in a framework that contrasts two extreme models: a Keynesian world of rigi
d real wages, and a neoclassical situation of flexible adjustment to econom
ic shocks. It was found that the Indonesian case is more consistent with th
e neoclassical than the Keynesian model, despite the tendency for greater g
overnment intervention in labour markets before the crisis. The paper also
finds that the large change in relative prices from the exchange rate depre
ciation had a smaller effect than expected on employment structure. These c
onclusions are discussed in the context of major changes in labour markets
prior to the economic crisis.