Prevalence of airways obstruction in a general population - European Respiratory Society vs American Thoracic Society definition

Citation
G. Viegi et al., Prevalence of airways obstruction in a general population - European Respiratory Society vs American Thoracic Society definition, CHEST, 117(5), 2000, pp. 339S-345S
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
117
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
2
Pages
339S - 345S
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(200005)117:5<339S:POAOIA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Study objectives: To evaluate the distribution of airways obstruction in a general population sample. Methods: Cross-sectional epidemiologic survey of a general population sampl e living in Po Delta area (North Italy). Data on respiratory symptoms, dise ases, and risk factors were collected through standardized interviewer-admi nistered questionnaires. Lung function tests were performed, with criteria for defining airways obstruction based on the 1995 European Respiratory Soc iety (ERS) statement (FEV1/vital capacity ratio < 88% predicted and < 89% p redicted in men and women, respectively), "clinical" criteria (FEV1/FVC rat io < 70%), and the 1986 American Thoracic Society (ATS) statement (FEV1/FVC ratio < 75%). Results: A total of 1,727 subjects aged > 25 years investigated from 1988 t o 1991 were included. Prevalence rates of airways obstruction for subjects 25 to 45 years old and subjects greater than or equal to 46 years old were as follows: ERS, 10.8% and 12.2%; clinical, 9.9% and 28.8%; and ATS, 27% an d 57%, respectively. When considering only moderate/severe obstruction, the rates were as follows: ERS, 0.4% and 3.6%; clinical, 0.3% and 4.4%; and AT S, 0.5% and 5.2%, respectively. The trend was confirmed after stratifying f or smoking habit and the presence/absence of respiratory symptoms/diseases. The highest specificity and predictive value for any respiratory symptom/d isease was shown by the ERS, and the lowest was shown by the ATS criterion, while the reverse was true for sensitivity; overall accuracy was slightly lower for the ATS criterion. Multiple logistic regression models indicated a higher number of significant associations with known risk factors for air ways obstruction according to clinical and ATS criteria than ERS criterion. Conclusions: The prevalence of COPD in a general population depends very mu ch on the criterion used for definition of airways obstruction. Further res earch is needed to reach a standardized and epidemiologically consistent cr iterion for airways obstruction.