Clinical predictors of discrepancy between self-ratings and examiner ratings for negative symptoms

Citation
Jp. Selten et al., Clinical predictors of discrepancy between self-ratings and examiner ratings for negative symptoms, COMP PSYCHI, 41(3), 2000, pp. 191-196
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
0010440X → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
191 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-440X(200005/06)41:3<191:CPODBS>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Little is known about the awareness of negative symptoms or its correlates, The aim of this study was to examine whether a number of clinical variable s can predict the discrepancy between ratings of negative symptoms made by schizophrenic patients and by an examiner. This discrepancy could provide a measure for the awareness of negative symptoms. Eighty-six schizophrenic p atients used a self-rating scale for negative symptoms with items derived f rom the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), A psychiatris t assessed ail patients using the SANS and other instruments, including the Present State Examination (PSE) item "insight into psychotic condition." N urses assessed all patients using the Rehabilitation Evaluation Hall and Ba ker (REHAB), a scale for the measurement of psychiatric disability, All mea surements were repeated after 2 months. A sensitive index for the underesti mation of the severity of negative symptoms was developed, the discrepancy score. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the predictability of discrepancy scores. Since scores for SANS items were used to calculate d iscrepancy scores, all regression analyses were performed with the SANS sum mary score as a covariate, The first step was to assess the independent con tribution of each variable to the prediction of discrepancy scores, The sec ond step was to examine the predictive quality of the 19 variables together . The variables themselves failed to make an independent contribution to th e prediction of discrepancy scores at both assessments. REHAB scores, for i nstance, contributed to the prediction of discrepancy scores at the first a ssessment, but not at the second. The results of the second step showed tha t the best model for the prediction of discrepancy scores included the vari ables of depression (negative association) and anxiety (positive associatio n). The absence of an association with the PSE item suggests that the aware ness of negative symptoms is not related to insight into positive symptoms, An important limitation of our study is the arbitrary method of discrepanc y quantification. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.