Ak. Singh et al., Role of islet autoimmunity in the aetiology of different clinical subtypesof diabetes mellitus in young north Indians, DIABET MED, 17(4), 2000, pp. 275-280
Aims To determine the role of islet autoimmunity in the aetiology of differ
ent clinical subtypes of diabetes mellitus in young north Indian patients b
y measuring islet autoantibodies.
Methods In a cross-sectional study, 145 young patients with diabetes (onset
< 30 years) were subdivided into the following categories: Type 1 diabetes
(n = 83), malnutrition-modulated diabetes mellitus (MMDM, n = 31) and fibr
o-calculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD, n = 31). MMDM subjects presented wit
h emaciation and severe insulin-requiring but ketosis-resistant diabetes, w
hile FCPD was associated with idiopathic chronic calcific pancreatitis. Ant
ibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) and IA-2 (IA-2 A) were detect
ed by immunoprecipitation of S-35-labelled recombinant antigens and cytopla
smic islet cell antibody (ICA) by indirect immunofluorescence.
Results GADA were present in a significant proportion (23%) of patients wit
h MMDM. In contrast, IA-2 A was increased only among patients with Type 1 d
iabetes (22%), but not MMDM (3%, P < 0.05). Among patients with a duration
of diabetes < 2 years, GADA and/or IA-2 A were found in 61% of Type 1 diabe
tic and 37% of MMDM patients (P < 0.01). MMDM patients who were positive fo
r GADA had a shorter duration of diabetes, but did not differ in their age
at onset of diabetes, body mass index, fasting plasma C-peptide, or frequen
cy of thyroid microsomal and parietal cell antibodies. FCPD subjects had th
e lowest prevalence of autoantibodies: IA-2 and ICA were absent, while GADA
were present in 7% (P < 0.05 vs. Type 1 diabetes).
Conclusions GADA, though not IA-2 A, were present in a substantial proporti
on of patients with the MMDM variant of diabetes, suggesting that islet aut
oimmunity map play a role in its pathogenesis. In contrast, none of the isl
et antibodies was increased in subjects with FCPD, making it likely that it
is a secondary type of diabetes.